that's edited, fake, u're a cocksucker just like michael is. and he's not dead, somewhere on the islands that do not show on official maps, drinking a cock..tail with elvis or god knows who.
Not a fake, google search National Enquirer Cover Arts, look for January 12, 2009 cover. http://www.magazine-agent.com/the-national-enquirer/covers?c=1&cov=COVER0024664.JPG&pg=2
They like to think of themselves as the jaded skeptic in a world full of gullible sheeple, determined to be a flickering light of truth in a dark internet full of lies and fake viral videos. "No one could really fart on a birthday cake that way!"
Why We Hate Them:
The guys we're talking about here are the knee-jerk skeptics, the ones who take it too far. They have an automatic reaction to call "fake" on pretty much any video that shows anything remotely remarkable happening. They're not doing it in some grand quest for truth, they just want to feel smarter than the room and generally suck all of the wonder out of the world.
Shut up anonymous, that's not why people shout fake all the time. People say fake and photoshopped etc. because it's a meme, and far from feeling superior to the "sheeple" as you put it, they're just mindlessly repeating what passes for humour on this intershit.
So fuck you.
TheGabe: Different anon here. Saying something is fake isn't a fucking meme. People who call fake can't believe something can happen by coincidence (in this case), or just actually be true because it seems so unlikely. So fuck you right back at you, Gabe.
ha i know this is a fake because i have the actual copy of this magazine... you can also tell its faked because of the blue border surrounding the michael jackson picture on this page. the blue border does not match up with any "style" of the page which therefore was faked or photo-shopped to make this possible....... i will shortly post the real picture, for my camera is m.i.a.
after a little search, looks real to me: http://popbytes.com/archive/2009/01/national_enquirer_back_on_popbytes.shtmlhttp://popbytes.com/archive/2009/01/national_enquirer_back_on_popbytes.shtml
18 are you serious? Crawl out from under that rock and realize that National Enquirer has been sold in US checkout lines for like, 40 years. Get out of the house, a clue, or both.
To all the Fake revelers, I actually remember SEEING this cover and thinking, "6 months? I wouldn't give him 6 days."
I guarantee you, some magazine SOMEWHERE posted in February that MJ had "5 months to live!" and another that said 6 months! And one that said 8! The fact that it's the national enquirer does not make it such a statement any more or less believable.
LOL how the hell can you debunk someone who is yelling FAKE by posting a link to the same article... THE FUCKING NEWSPAPER ARTICLE WAS FAKE.. NOT THIS PICTURE.. ALL OF THEM..
stop linking like your proving something, the whole fucking thing is fake not just here, the newspaper prints bogus stories on PURPOSE so OFC its FAKE.. now did that cut it out in edible slices for you tards ?
I have definitely seen many shoops, and this tops them all. The pixels were indeed very well done, but from reimaging and examining and cross-referencing the pixels, I can, without a doubt, say...
Has anyone ever noticed that commenting on images, especially on this website turns from "huh... Look at that" or "that's cool, i guess" to "19, You're such a dumbass! I wish I could go to your house and shove this massive dildo up your ass!" Or "ANYONE WHO THINKS THIS IS PHOTOSHOPPED IS A FUCKING IDIOT WHO WAS NEVER LOVED AS A CHILD."? It's just fascinating what people will say to other people on the internet, especially considering they will probably never meet the person they are calling a dumb fucker who they're going to strangle with their own dick. You just know that these people would never go into public and actually say anything like that to someones face, because they're too much of a pussy. I just think it's funny. You know what else would be funny is if 97 other people replied to this comment calling me a fucker and wanting to shove their dick in my ass. because more than likely they have read down this far and don't even know what the original post was about
I cannot be sure.... but I think this whole conversation is fake and has been photoshopped. Also it is an EPIC FAIL, like the fail whale. I can tell by the pixels and from seeing many photoshops in my day. But YO DAWG I heard you like the National Enquirer, so I put a National Enquirer in yo National Enquirer so you can read the National Enquirer while you read the National Enquirer! CAN I HAZ CHEEZBERGER NOW?
Google it. There are several other articles (with comments)about how some guy speculated his drug addiction would lead to his demise within 6 months. Pretty crazy.
@ 4
I seriously hope people don't start acting like he's elvis. It's bad enough there's a bunch of fat people in white spandex invading Los Vegas... we don't need a bunch of freaks pretending to be a pedophile. Or worse... NOT pretending.
THE ENQUIRER FIRST REPORTED JACKO HAD SIX MONTHS TO LIVE IN OUR JAN 12, 2009 ISSUE
Photo by: Splash News Online The ENQUIRER reported months ago that worried pals feared Michael Jackson would die in the next six months!
FROM JANUARY 12, 2009: Michael Jackson is dying - and has only six months to live, pals fear.
Sadly, the desperately ill star is bedridden much of the time, and his electrifying stage performances are a thing of the past, reveal sources.
Incredible reports surfaced in late December that Jackson is battling a rare, deadly genetic disorder and requires a lung transplant. Although the singer denied the reports, The ENQUIRER was told by sources that his health is deteriorating rapidly because of a crippling addiction to painkillers and alcohol.
A source close to the star divulged: "It's tragic. His condition is just so far gone, I'd be surprised if he lasts six months.
Legit or not the six months to live quote is from Ian Halperin and was published in many articles starting in December 2008. Ian Halperin recently published a biography that had gone to press just before MJ died and production stopped to include MJ's death.
dunno if anyone'll read this far down, but to the morons who think it means "6 months to his live tour," that makes fuck all sense, why would a 'family friend' be quoted in that context? as far as the rest is concerned, i really dont give a shit
Just for the record, all these guys posting "FAAAKE" are simply trolls, and you're just feeding them, playing right into their plans. Learn to just ignore them :P
Or, this magazine picks a random "easy target" celeb and posts the same "6 months to live" crap every other month... it's not a hard thing to speculate on, and it's not like they can be too discredited if the guy doesn't die as predicted, he simply has a "miraculous recovery." it's not rocket science, it's tabloidery!
Even though the magazine is fake the point is the surprise that they actually got something right. So for all you people saying it's fake... blah blah blah it doesn't matter, the whole point was how funny it was BECAUSE it actually gave some legit news.
They like to think of themselves as the jaded skeptic in a world full of gullible sheeple, determined to be a flickering light of truth in a dark internet full of lies and fake viral videos. 'No one could really fart on a birthday cake that way!'
Why We Hate Them:
The guys we're talking about here are the knee-jerk skeptics, the ones who take it too far. They have an automatic reaction to call 'fake' on pretty much any video that shows anything remotely remarkable happening. They're not doing it in some grand quest for truth, they just want to feel smarter than the room and generally suck all of the wonder out of the world"
Who are they?
They like to think of themselves as the jaded skeptic in a world full of gullible sheeple, determined to be a flickering light of truth in a dark internet full of lies and fake viral video posts. "No one could really think that a man who farts on a birthday cake is a faker!"
Why we hate them:
The guys we're talking about here are the knee-jerk skeptics, the ones who take it too far. They have an automatic reaction to call "not fake" on pretty much any video that shows anything remotely remarkable happening. They're not doing it in some grand quest for truth, they just want to feel smarter than the room and generally suck all of the wonder out of the world.
edit - remove - report - save#89 - by Ikanhascheeseburgerfakesh
(mj9Pgg.Ws.) -
Aug 14, 2009
First I would like to point out that The National Enquirer is a serious hard hitting factual news magazine on par with some of the top news sources like Fox news. Second the picture wasn't altered, so stop saying that. The cover was obviously physically altered before taking the photo. The pixels look wrong because of the conversion from bmp to jpg. Third, Micheal Jackson is dead and I honestly think the police should be investigating the reporter that submitted the article to the magazine. Please people let's keep this a serious discussion of the above image. What are we children out to get revenge on Micheal.
similar to the fake meme http://xkcd.com/331/
some people may say fake or shopped or whatever because they honestly believe it, but many people out there do it as a trollish meme, as hyperbolised in the above xkcd.
comments:
"FAKE!"
Who Are They?
They like to think of themselves as the jaded skeptic in a world full of gullible sheeple, determined to be a flickering light of truth in a dark internet full of lies and fake viral videos. "No one could really fart on a birthday cake that way!"
Why We Hate Them:
The guys we're talking about here are the knee-jerk skeptics, the ones who take it too far. They have an automatic reaction to call "fake" on pretty much any video that shows anything remotely remarkable happening. They're not doing it in some grand quest for truth, they just want to feel smarter than the room and generally suck all of the wonder out of the world.
So fuck you.
To all the Fake revelers, I actually remember SEEING this cover and thinking, "6 months? I wouldn't give him 6 days."
Now to see it connected is just... creepy.
http://www.magazine-agent.com/the-national-enquirer/covers?c=1&cov=COVER0024664.JPG&pg=2
To prove it's not fake you bunch of assholes.
I guarantee you, some magazine SOMEWHERE posted in February that MJ had "5 months to live!" and another that said 6 months! And one that said 8! The fact that it's the national enquirer does not make it such a statement any more or less believable.
I can tell from the pixels and from having seen quite a few shoops in my time.
stop linking like your proving something, the whole fucking thing is fake not just here, the newspaper prints bogus stories on PURPOSE so OFC its FAKE.. now did that cut it out in edible slices for you tards ?
FAKE.
Is a shoop.
Nice try guys.
I seriously hope people don't start acting like he's elvis. It's bad enough there's a bunch of fat people in white spandex invading Los Vegas... we don't need a bunch of freaks pretending to be a pedophile. Or worse... NOT pretending.
Lol there's no way you could edit anything in MSPaint to look legit you dipshit.
THE ENQUIRER FIRST REPORTED JACKO HAD SIX MONTHS TO LIVE IN OUR JAN 12, 2009 ISSUE
Photo by: Splash News Online The ENQUIRER reported months ago that worried pals feared Michael Jackson would die in the next six months!
FROM JANUARY 12, 2009: Michael Jackson is dying - and has only six months to live, pals fear.
Sadly, the desperately ill star is bedridden much of the time, and his electrifying stage performances are a thing of the past, reveal sources.
Incredible reports surfaced in late December that Jackson is battling a rare, deadly genetic disorder and requires a lung transplant. Although the singer denied the reports, The ENQUIRER was told by sources that his health is deteriorating rapidly because of a crippling addiction to painkillers and alcohol.
A source close to the star divulged: "It's tragic. His condition is just so far gone, I'd be surprised if he lasts six months.
"Typical Comment
'FAKE!'
Who Are They?
They like to think of themselves as the jaded skeptic in a world full of gullible sheeple, determined to be a flickering light of truth in a dark internet full of lies and fake viral videos. 'No one could really fart on a birthday cake that way!'
Why We Hate Them:
The guys we're talking about here are the knee-jerk skeptics, the ones who take it too far. They have an automatic reaction to call 'fake' on pretty much any video that shows anything remotely remarkable happening. They're not doing it in some grand quest for truth, they just want to feel smarter than the room and generally suck all of the wonder out of the world"
Who are they?
They like to think of themselves as the jaded skeptic in a world full of gullible sheeple, determined to be a flickering light of truth in a dark internet full of lies and fake viral video posts. "No one could really think that a man who farts on a birthday cake is a faker!"
Why we hate them:
The guys we're talking about here are the knee-jerk skeptics, the ones who take it too far. They have an automatic reaction to call "not fake" on pretty much any video that shows anything remotely remarkable happening. They're not doing it in some grand quest for truth, they just want to feel smarter than the room and generally suck all of the wonder out of the world.
Well that's ironic.
oh hey, look what i found...
some people may say fake or shopped or whatever because they honestly believe it, but many people out there do it as a trollish meme, as hyperbolised in the above xkcd.