The Robert L. Capp collection at the Hoover Institution Archives contains ten never-before-published photographs illustrating the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing. These photographs, taken by an unknown Japanese photographer, were found in 1945 among rolls of undeveloped film in a cave outside Hiroshima by U.S. serviceman Robert L. Capp, who was attached to the occupation forces. Unlike most photos of the Hiroshima bombing, these dramatically convey the human as well as material destruction unleashed by the atomic bomb. Mr. Capp donated them to the Hoover Archives in 1998 with the provision that they not be reproduced until 2008. Three of these photographs are reproduced in Atomic Tragedy with the permission of the Capp family. The entire set is available below. Please contact Sean L. Malloy (smalloy@ucmerced.edu) if you have any information that might help identify the original photographer.
share:
|
comments:
These images won't evince the slightest bit of emotionalism out of me.
But I get your point: why is it the world mourns for the victims of Hiroshima, but has forgotten the sex slaves of Korea, the exterminations of Nanking, the death marches of the Philippines, and the other Japanese atrocities which necessitated such a response.
You'd think from listening to so many, that the Japanese would be happier to see two million more of their wives and children slaughtered in a prolonged, conventional war, which their deified leader would have condemned them to.
Or maybe we were supposed to let the Japanese slaughter millions of Philippinos, Koreans, Manchurians, Hawaiians, Californians, etc.
"North Tinian tower,this is Dimples 8-2 requesting taxi clearance."
Col Paul Tibbets
6 August,1945
Without any question from anyone, all posters seem the need to defend the morality of the action. So it seems some internal struggle is going on.
Personally I guess nuking a Japanese mountain as a warning that the US was serious would have done the trick.
The blame for the death of the worlds first nuclear encounters rests firmly on the heads and souls of the Japanese leaders who initiated that war.
Japs got what they asked for !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
War is cruelty. There's no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.” -William Tecumseh Sherman
We have no grudges against them now, but we do remember the atrocities the Japanese did, and we do appreciate what the US did. It must have been a difficult action for the US to take then, but as unpleasant as the pictures are, the atomic bomb saved uncountable innocent lives if the war dragged on.
What we should do is remember and learn and not let it happen again, ie Iran.
Glad you enjoyed the pictures. Let me know when your tribe discovers fire...and spelling.
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan." Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.
"The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender." Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman.
Would that be OK then?
With such a violent mentality and attitude, it's no wonder why your kids get shot in schools
Killing is justifiable as long as you feel good about it...right!
I'm can only be happy that most people on this world are not americans
"I'm can only be happy that most people on this world are not americans"
We would be happy if you weren't here with your stupid KUMBYAH BS victim crap. It must really suck to be you, moron
a despicable war crime, comparable to anything the nazis did. "Facts not in evidence
No one enjoys war or killing (except for the truly sick) but to do nothing you get Rowanda where was the world population while that was going on?
Obviously you don't know history, so do not assault the 18th poster. (S)he quotes explicitly Adm. Nimitz saying the Japanese already wanted peace. The claim that it would have taken millions of soldiers to take Japan is totally false. The Chicago Tribune even reported before war's end that the Japanese wanted to surrender. The problem is you can't surrender when the other guy's still shooting. The only condition was the emperor stayed on the throne, which in fact he did.
Those bombings were about scaring Stalin, plain and simple. We wanted to prove to him we were stronger than the USSR and this provided an opportunity.
Plus, wasn't it a nice coincidence that the first bomb dropped the day before the Soviet Union was obligated to join the US in fighting Japan?
Reality isn't always what you were made to believe at the time. If so, the Iraq war would still be about WMD, I mean Oil, I mean al Qaeda, I mean liberating the Iraqis...
Last point, I wish I could say something malicious and didn't have the guts to at least ascribe a name to it. That's shameful behavior. Too bad you won't come back to this page to read this.
Obviously you don't know history, so do not assault the 18th poster. (S)he quotes explicitly Adm. Nimitz saying the Japanese already wanted peace. The claim that it would have taken millions of soldiers to take Japan is totally false. The Chicago Tribune even reported before war's end that the Japanese wanted to surrender. The problem is you can't surrender when the other guy's still shooting. The only condition was the emperor stayed on the throne, which in fact he did.
Those bombings were about scaring Stalin, plain and simple. We wanted to prove to him we were stronger than the USSR and this provided an opportunity.
Plus, wasn't it a nice coincidence that the first bomb dropped the day before the Soviet Union was obligated to join the US in fighting Japan?
Reality isn't always what you were made to believe at the time. If so, the Iraq war would still be about WMD, I mean Oil, I mean al Qaeda, I mean liberating the Iraqis...
Last point, I wish I could say something malicious and didn't have the guts to at least ascribe a name to it. That's shameful behavior. Too bad you won't come back to this page to read this.
You would like to think so but the fact is that even after one nuclear bombing of a city they still wouldn't give up.
It had to be done. The world, including America, morned the loss of life.
They did not start it, the US outright provoked the war. Im sad to see you think that 100,000 civilian deaths is justified.
We drop an a-bomb and people who were not even alive at the time are proud of it...
Way to go America.
I can't wait til a terrorist detonates a backpack nuke in one of your major cities you hateful bastards.reap the fucking whirlwind.
noone deserves things like that.
Wow there sure is a lot of intelligence on this board *sarcasm*
We drop an a-bomb and people who were not even alive at the time are proud of it...
Way to go America.
So leave
my dad was scheduled for the invasion of japan. i am happy that he did not have to go. he survived the war. do i feel bad about the pics of the dead people? yes.
but i am happier that we won, and they lost.
back to topic:
This was a truly a sad event and we can only hope our leaders are smart enough to never repeat it again.
GTAIV BABY
Poster for 38, I can't wait to see what list you end up on. Hope you live overseas, just forwarded your post to the FBI tip page. I am sure if you are insane enough to actually post something this hateful and inarticulate that you have other skeletons beyond words and towards action. You posted anonymous, you may find that not quite good enough. Are you willing to bring that backpack in? Good luck trying now, and watch your back if you do come to the US.
These pictures should be a way of telling us that war should never be the answer even if it's to "get the back". Especially nuclear warfare. The consequences of which (i.e. radiation) many Japanese have to suffer from even today.
Another thing that astounds and disappoints me is how little so many of you know about American history or WWII in general.
Please THINK before you speak such strong statements.
"well, he should've armed himself shouldn't he"
born into love we grow up to be walking contradicitons
compared to what the usa do all over the world the japanese were angels compared to american morons
Don't paint the U.S. as some big savior. We're not. I'm glad I live in the U.S. I wouldn't want to live anywhere else. But our past is stained with more blood than I care to think about.
As far as China is concerned, the west did really awful things there. We were involved in one of the largest ever human trafficking events in history (involving packaging women into boxes to be shipped to the U.S. as sex slaves). We got an entire continent addicted to opium so we could take as much money as possible and create chaos. Don't forget about the fact that we abducted people in Africa and forced them into slave labor here. We forced millions off their ancestral lands and massacred them if they resisted (look up Chief Joseph). Rape, pillage and murder taint our history and makings. What we've done is despicable. The atomic bomb is just one of thousands of examples of our war crimes.
I understand why some of you are saying that the Japanese "got what they deserved" but that is a silly statement as the Japanese civilians did not start the war. Their government did. Many people in the U.S. do not like the war in Iraq however if Iraqis were to bomb U.S. civilians every American would be outraged. At the same time I do not want to sound like a war hating hippie because I am not. War is a part of human life. Almost every single technology that we rely on to get around town or to talk to our friends or to fly across the U.S. are all created through war. The internet itself was created in order to have faster data communication for the U.S. government to assist in war efforts. So if you hate war as much as you say I suggest you get off your computer (or at least the internet) immediately because ITS A PRODUCT OF WAR! Someone suggested the U.S. provoked the war and if you truly believe that I am very confused because they didn't. The Japanese were on Hitlers side so however the U.S. provoked being bombed by a nation who supports a sick dictator who murders innocents like they are garbage, I'm really interested to know how exactly it was the U.S's fault. None of us truly know whether or not nuking Japan was necessary, and those who think quoting people from that era makes them correct you are incredibly foolish. I could find a million quotes supporting the bombings and a million that don't support them, opinions are like assholes everyone has them. The only thing we should take out of this is that Nuclear war is terrible. It does horrible things to innocent cities and people. Lets all work together to prevent another such devastation of a country. We are all humans, we should not live to kill each other however when evil arises ( Germany Italy and Japan ) I see no shame or harm in bringing it down.
Finally I leave you with these thoughts.
=Those who crave war are cruel.
-Those who think war must be eliminated are naive.
-Those who see war for is cruelty but know that it is an inevitability while evil exists see humanity in its reality, there will always be evil without it good has no meaning.
Then you call muslims terrorists and fundamentalists. Good joke.
stand and deliver
i can't understand how you can't feel sympathy
Why did Japan send bombers all the way across the Pacific Ocean to bomb the United States? It was not easy to fly across the Pacific Famed aviator Amelia Earhart was never heard from again after attempting a non-stop flight through the Pacific just a few years before WWII.
So why did the Japanese send aircraft carriers across the ocean to bomb Pearl Harbour? Were they planning to invade a country of hundreds of millions of people that was on the other side of the planet? Were they just having some fun? "Ooh, I know, I know, let's bomb the Americans! They'll never expect it!" Hmm? Why?
Japan and America were fighting for control over the countries of the Pacific Rim during the 1930s. The American possession of the colony of the Philippines allowed them to interfere with the Asian expansionist agenda of the Japanese. The Americans were supplying Chinese rebels in Manchuria extending the Japanese fight in China. The US did this to undermine and weaken the Japanese. The Americans of 1940s were complete racists (putting Japanese-American citizens in POW camps) and even thirty years later American soldiers would be talking about "gooks". So don't get the idea that America was worried about the Asians who suffered Japanese brutalities.
The final straw was when America stopped supplying oil to the Japanese in 1941. Japan had no native oil fields and they had to import every drop of oil used in the country. Negotiations failed and war became necessary. Before you condemn it ask what US would do if Saudi Arabia just stopped selling oil to them tomorrow. The American economy would crash overnight and America would have to invade Saudi Arabia to forcibly take oil from them. The Japanese faced the same future and that's why they bombed Pearl Harbour.
My point is this: Pearl Harbour was the event that turned a decade long cold war between Japan and America into a hot war. Japan was simply quicker at making a pre-emptive strike. Before you condemn pre-emptive strikes, remember America and Iraq (and America and hundreds of other countries this century). Pearl Harbour had a history behind it. The Japanese did not attack without reason, contrary to what many Americans think.
Secondly, I wish to ask a question: Why is it assumed that America had to invade Japan in 1945? I noted before that Japan had no oil and was not mineral rich country. America had blockaded Japan completely and was carpet bombing (200,000+ dead from conventional bombing) the country. The Japanese economy was in absolute ruins. Metals and oils and other materials needed for war fighting were very scarce. I've read somewhere that the Japanese could not put up a single fighter to interdict the American bomber containing the nuclear bombs.
Of course, the Japanese would have fiercely resisted any land invasion, but why invade a country that could not really fight back? Why not blockade the country until the Japanese came to their senses or do it indefinitely? America has been technically at war with North Korea for over fifty years. Americans still maintain thousands of soldiers on the North Korean border today. Why couldn't the US Navy do the same to the Japanese islands? What would the Japanese do? Float over in rafts and scream at American destroyers?
Why did the choice have to be between a massive land invasion and the greatest act of (nuclear) terrorism that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians?
Do you think the men dictating the attacks, American and Japanese, cared about Children dying? Mothers, Fathers, whole families dying? Or did they only care about American children dying? Or Japanese children dying? Does it matter where they were, they were just children who were murdered.
The victims of these attacks on America and Japan did not instigate them. So no, they did not deserve to be murdered no.1.
And what have you done in your life, sit back and complain ?.
"Nanking was China's problem" oh that is the perfect answer for a coward. And Rowanda was their problem, and the Kurds was Saddam's problem. Keep your head firmly buried up you ass.
You American bastards! I celebrated long and hard when September 11 struck! Even opened a bottle of champagne, death to America!"
I guess that says enough of what you are. You are the type of looser that make my life worth living. I would like nothing more than to be the one that pisses on your grave you coward E.S.A.D